Ex-Army intelligence analyst Manning jailed for refusing to testify on WikiLeaks
Former U.S. Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning was taken to jail on Friday after a federal judge in Alexandria, Virginia, held her in contempt for refusing to testify before a federal grand jury
Friday, 8th March 2019
Former U.S. Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning was taken to jail on Friday after a federal judge in Alexandria, Virginia, held her in contempt for refusing to testify before a federal grand jury, representatives for Manning and the U.S. Justice Department confirmed.
Manning had appeared before the grand jury on Wednesday but declined to answer questions in connection with what is widely believed to be the government’s long-running investigation into Wikileaks and its founder Julian Assange, citing her First, Fourth and Sixth Amendment rights under the Constitution.
She returned to court Friday for a hearing and Judge Claude Hilton of the U.S. District Court for the District of Virginia weighed the legal arguments Manning used to justify her decision to defy the grand jury subpoena.
Manning’s communications team released a statement saying the judge said she will be detained until she either cooperates or the grand jury finishes its term.
It is unclear exactly why federal prosecutors want Manning to testify, although her representatives say the questions she was asked concern the release of information she disclosed to the public in 2010 through WikiLeaks.
Manning was convicted by court-martial in 2013 of espionage and other offenses for furnishing more than 700,000 documents, videos, diplomatic cables and battlefield accounts to WikiLeaks while she was an intelligence analyst in Iraq.
Former U.S. President Barack Obama, in his final days in office, commuted the final 28 years of Manning’s 35-year sentence.
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who has been a longtime target of a criminal investigation in the United States, had promised to accept extradition if Manning was freed.
Assange has been living in the Ecuadorean Embassy in London since 2012.
A document that prosecutors say was filed in federal court last year by mistake appeared to show that federal authorities already have obtained a sealed indictment against Assange.
After journalists discovered the document, prosecutors declined to either confirm or deny a sealed indictment had been issued by the Alexandria-based grand jury, which has been hearing evidence on Assange and Wikileaks for years.
Latest
- Barbados officially announces highest state honour for India...
-
Who is Philippe Martinez, and how did he end up in the Carib... -
Grenada crowned 2024 Caribbean Destination of the Year by Ca... -
Philippe Martinez demanded $40M to $100M from St Kitts and N... -
$320 Smoked Ham sparks outrage in Belize: Viral photo fuels...
Related Articles
Friday, 8th March 2019
Friday, 8th March 2019
Friday, 8th March 2019
Friday, 8th March 2019
Friday, 8th March 2019